Tuesday, June 30, 2015

3 + 1 MAIN LAWS OF THOUGHT AND LOGIC...! Fully compliant with Pure Logic the True Complete Science of Sciences!







3 + 1 MAIN LAWS OF THOUGHT AND LOGIC...! 

Fully compliant with Pure Logic the True Complete Science of Sciences!
FULLY COMPLIANT WITH PURE LOGIC, as these Laws are it's basis!
Or Pure Logic "derives" the Complementary Antecedent or Parallel Logic or not necessarily excluded or bivalent!



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_thought
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Fourfold_Root_of_the_Principle_of_Sufficient_Reason
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_bivalence


[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_identity
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_noncontradiction
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_excluded_middle
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_sufficient_reason


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Boole
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Schopenhauer
http://www.amazon.com/Investigation-Laws-Thought-George-Boole/dp/1602064520
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_thought#Hamilton_.281837.E2.80.9338_lectures_on_Logic.2C_published_1860.29:_a_4th_.22Law_of_Reason_and_Consequent.22
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_William_Hamilton,_9th_Baronet



...Examples:

[a] To the contrary to Richard Dawkins and others in Biology Evolution, the impossibility to prove God or gods and entities, is claiming to not have the logic to do so!
 
Hence what you claim that cannot be proven, does not imply the derived logic, that then there are no Gods!
You lack data and forensics to disprove God or gods, or are using wrong logic!

The regressive loop, of having to prove then the origin and existence of God or gods, is broken, to parallel or other logic, in that you are not or cannot go back in time far enough to prove the regressive non-logic loop, that they use as a proof of no-God-gods!

This is similar as having to prove the existence of Energy, and if energy is eternal, or if matter is Eternal! The logic derived and inferred, is limited to "knowledge", and escapes our normal Logic of Thoughts and Laws of Thought!
In pure logic we declare the existence of "abysses of knowledge", in which Logic can only present as many solutions we can deduce or infer, as highly or lower possible and feasible...!!! Or even what we have not thought of before!

PLEASE REFER TO MY FUTURE BOOK2 : "Another & Continued Book of Pure Logic" - George Frederick Thomson Broadhead


[b] The same as What was first? The Hen or the Egg?

 
Was it needed to be developed the system/organs to form Eggs?
Or was it the first development of the living being where the egg is formed and/or self fertilized or externally fertilized by another male?

Evolution declares that as some beings like some worms, reproduce by mere self division in half, to form two identical beings, so Beings went developing more complex forms of reproduction...!!!

In Pure Logic, we see life as it is in Genetic Engineering! It takes more than having a base being to form an intelligent Being, and all or most is programmed in the DNA and animal cell, to form a male or female being child.
THE DNA programs the right formation of all in the Being, and we need a basic Egg and Sperm Cells with this information to be shared to form adequate reproducing intelligent independent beings in the animal World and Human World!
SO WE NEED WHERE TO PUT THE INITIAL DNA INTO!
MAKING THIS A "ABYSS OF KNOWLEDGE" AS TO OUR KNOWN SCIENCE TODAY! AS WE HAVE NOT MADE LIFE IN THE LABORATORY YET, NOR A ANIMAL CELL AND HUMAN CELL!

So we cannot apply mere known Logic, to these "abysses of knowledge and/or logic", and infer and deduce truths from unknown truths.

ALL THIS IS MENTIONED CLEARLY OR INITIALLY in my first Book: "Book of Pure Logic".



.
.
.